Information and methods
To research stereotypes of subgroups of females and you will boys, we first presented a good pilot studies to assemble a listing of modern-day intercourse subgroups when you look at the Norwegian people.
Pilot Study
Users (Letter = 60) was indeed approached publicly in the city heart out of Bergen, Norway, and you can requested to take part in a primary survey on and therefore organizations it feel that ladies and you may men during the society was split up in to. Among participants, fifty.0% had been people. An effective forty-eight.3% was indeed people (that participant failed to answer fully the question about gender/sex dos ) while the imply years are (SD = , assortment 18–79). The vast majority of (90.0%) did not have an immigrant records. The others had both immigrated on their own (6.7%) or was indeed Norwegian produced to a single otherwise a couple immigrant moms and dads (1.7%). You to definitely fellow member don’t address the back ground concern.
The brand new tuition to the users is since the: ‘There are various “types” of females in the present community. Delight write-down as much different kinds of people (age.g., parents out of young kids, businesswomen) as you possibly can think about.’ The rest of the webpage try left empty toward fellow member to write towards the. Into the a unique webpage, the same education writing about style of guys try showed. Your order away from speech is actually counterbalanced with the intention that 50 % of the players listed girls very first, others 1 / 2 of detailed men first.
Normally, the players indexed eight.28 different types of women (SD = 4.07, diversity 0–21) and 7.42 different varieties of people (SD = 4.47, diversity 0–24). Three standards was basically used to figure out which teams might possibly be chosen given that stimulus teams however research: (a) the group had to be stated by the about five members, (b) i tried to own groups of some other public opportunities and you will groups (age.grams., organizations defined because of the members of the family and you can elite positions and you will sexual orientations), and you may (c) we wanted to guarantee that we’d synchronous female and male subgroups (e.g., male people in politics and you can people political figures, single parents, and you may solitary dads) so you’re able to facilitate comparisons of individuals consuming an equivalent societal part and you will group. The options one a groups are going to be mentioned by the five professionals are informed by past published works (e.grams., Lee and you will Fiske, 2006; Dentro de et al., 2013) however, has also been pragmatic in the same way one to a more strict standards create limit the quantity of organizations included and you may a more easy one would encompass too many organizations to get ranked.
Considering these criteria, 19 men subgroups (company boys, dads away from little ones, police- and you will fire fighters, bachelors, rich men, performs boys, mellow males, men youngsters, outdoorsy males, solitary fathers, convenient guys, unmarried males, male management, old boys, gay boys, male academics, stylish males, male political figures, and you will rockers) and you may 22 subgroups of women (unmarried moms and dads, females politicians, occupation girls, mothers from children, nurses, hi5 feminists, lady people, outdoorsy girls, teachers (the feminine brand of the phrase for the Norwegian was applied), lesbians, dated ladies, writers, solitary people, immigrant ladies, macho people, girls, girls writers and singers, exercise ladies, ladies teachers, styles girls, housewives, and you may women leaders) was indeed chose.
Opting for teams in part predicated on its salience regarding pilot try isn’t instead dangers. Because Fiske et al. (2002) discussed, one another teams eliciting antipathy and in-organizations is generally less likely to arrive. I understand that the directory of communities is restricted a number of ways: For example, record doesn’t contain the full range of intimate orientations (elizabeth.g., bisexual women or men is actually omitted, heterosexuality was not said regarding the airplane pilot and presumably pulled for granted), and “immigrants” were used as opposed to indicating particular ethnicities or nations away from source. We’re not indicating which our checklist is member of subgroups that ladies and you will people may end up in. But not, this new groups chose are outstanding in the Norwegian perspective, and many of your own provided intercourse subgroups were known within the past research various other federal contexts (Athenstaedt mais aussi al., 2008).